Arlington City Council’s Special Use Permits for Urban Drilling is an unaddressed PUBLIC RISK !

Here is a letter to the Arlington City Council forwarning of a pending widespread class action lawsuit based on the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board’s recommendations………
From: Kim Feil <kimfeil@sbcglobal.net>
Date: February 20, 2012 10:56:33 AM CST
To: Robert Shepard <robert.shepard@arlingtontx.gov>, “Dr. Robert Cluck” <robert.cluck@arlingtontx.gov>, Robert Rivera <robert.rivera@arlingtontx.gov>, Jimmy Bennett <jimmy.bennett@arlingtontx.gov>, “Kathryn.Wilemon@arlingtontx.gov” <kathryn.wilemon@arlingtontx.gov>, Lana Wolff <lana.wolff@arlingtontx.gov>, Sheri Capeharts <sheri.capehart@arlingtontx.gov>, Jim Parajon <jim.parajon@arlingtontx.gov>, Don Crowson <don.crowson@arlingtontx.gov>, Jim Self <jim.self@arlingtontx.gov>
Cc: Julie Hunt <Julie.Hunt@arlingtontx.gov>, Arlington Voice LLC <info@arlingtonvoice.com>, tips@wfaa.com, Brett Shipp <bshipp@wfaa.com>, Susan Schrock <sschrock@star-telegram.com>, aubrey.mcclendon@chk.com, charles.davis@chk.com, AskChesapeake@chk.com

Subject: Public health risks not being addressed/excerpts worth noting on SEAB
I’m glad that it was recognized below that we have a need to know the emissions during each stage of the life cycle of drilling for natural gas.
The concerns that I have expressed to council over and over again is that we do NOT HAVE PRE-PRODUCTION EMISSION NUMBERS…this does put the public at risk and you were sworn in to protect the public.
Until we know the pre-productions emission…a M O R A T O R I U M is an appropriate course of action.
Your inaction in not addressing public health concerns puts the city in jeopardy of a widespread class action lawsuit.
Urban drilling is not safe for the residents as evidence of our fire chief requesting additional funds and as evidence of the SEAB recommendations below.
Clearly, we see the exhaust from the rigs and trucks.
Clearly the fracking process has toxics from the frack fluid present.
The airborne sand and dust is a health hazard.
The flow back and mud cuttings are being exposed to the public.
We do not have an adequate air quality portion to our gas drilling ordinance or adequate protections for our drinking water from surface fallout and spills.
The sound issues and Acoustic Vibration Disease are a reality and occurring as I type this.
Until the drillers can address the 17 issues that I see represent a hazard to the public if NOT implemented…for ME…my city is not protecting my family.
As a tax payer, I expect that I can live in a safe environment BUT  urban drilling has undermined the safety of where I live and what I am being made to breathe via the SUP.
————————————

Secretary of Energy Advisory board

http://www.shalegas.energy.gov/resources/comments_seab_draft_report.pdf


Summary of Public Comments on the SEAB Shale Gas Subcommittee 90-day Report
August 17, 2011
Overview of Comments Received
A total of 163 comments were received. Many respondents made several points:
• Sixty-six respondents complained that the comment period was too short. Some
of these asked for not only a longer comment period, but additional public
meetings on the report.
• Thirty-eight respondents objected to what they perceived as a strong industry bias
in the Subcommittee and its report.
• Many comments did not address specific elements or recommendations of the
report, but made general recommendations for: o Greater regulation of hydraulic fracturing (20 comments). o Halting all natural gas drilling/fracturing (19 comments). o Supporting renewable energy and/or water quality over natural gas
production (30 comments). o Eliminating non-disclosure clauses in damage settlements with natural gas
companies (6 comments).

• About 20 comments cited media reports or personal experiences as evidence of the dangers of hydraulic fracturing.


Summary of Detailed Analyses (excerpts)
Independent Petroleum Association of America, Washington, DC: The
organization makes recommendations and provides detailed comments refuting the material submitted to the Subcommittee by the organization EARTHWORKS and the Oil and Gas Accountability Project.
American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, DC:
o That the report propose that microseismic surveys be used to assure protection of ground water; fractures cannot be required to stay within the producing formation.
Air: (a) Reduction of pollutants and methane emissions from all shale gas production/delivery activity. (b) Establishment of an emission measurement and reporting system at various points in the production chain.
———————————————————————————
FYI, I have been waiting on Julie Hunt (City of Arlington Water Dept. manager), to respond on the recommendation of the need to protect surface water being recognized here…..

http://www.shalegas.energy.gov/resources/111811_final_report.pdf         page 8

(3) Recommendations that require new partnerships or mechanisms for success new mechanisms for success

13 Agencies should review field experience and modernize rules and enforcement practices to ensure protection of drinking and surface waters.
Reflects Subcommittee unease that the present arrangement of shared federal and state responsibility for cradle-to-grave water quality is not working smoothly or as well as it should.
—————————————————————————————-

Regarding Public Input on the Emergency Management and Response
Name: Jennifer Powell
Comment:
My concern is that relating to the recent incident in Lisbon, Ohio where a gas line ruptured due to lack of repair and too much pressure at a substation. Luckily no one was in proximity. When this event occured it shook my house from the foundation and I live 5 miles from the site. When we went outside we could hear the roar of a large jet engine or so we thought and believed that an airliner coming out of or to Pittsburgh had crashed. We saw a tower of flames shooting hundreds of feet into the sky and we live on top of a foothill. When we tried to contact 911 the lines were busy. My nephew and neighor finally got through and the opperator said that they were unable to locate the fire due to the number of calls coming in. It took emergency responders over an hour to locate a fire that was seen 50 miles away! It was also visible on satalite! There was a mass of confusion on how to get ahold of the company that owned the lines becuase companies had been bought and sold which delayed shutting off the supply of gas feeding the blast. It was soo hot that no one was able to get near the source and all fire fighting equipment was useless. Responders were used to create a perimerter and to evacuate local homes instead. Becuase of the rural setting it was difficult for them to do this. Thankfully only one home was damaged and no one was harmed, oh except for some barbecued cows. How many gallons of gas burnt up? Who knows. No one seems to care all of this is just collatoral dammage, as long as we can suck the gas out of the ground. I think that we need better failsafes in place before we go blowing up our homes and property to line the pockets of the oil barons!


Sincerely,

Kim Feil

Advertisements

About Kim Triolo Feil

Since TX Statute 253.005 forbids drilling in heavily settled municipalities, I unsuccessfully ran for City Council Seat to try to enforce this. Since Urban Drilling, our drinking water has almost tripled for TTHM's. Before moving to Arlington in 1990, I lived in Norco’s “cancer alley”, a refinery town. It was only after Urban Drilling in Arlington did I start having health effects. After our drill site was established closest to my home, the chronic nosebleeds started. I know there are more canaries here in Arlington having reactions to our industrialized airshed (we have 55-60 padsites of gas wells). Come forward and report to me those having health issues especially if you live to the north/northwest of a drill site so I can map your health effects on this blog. My youtube account is KimFeilGood. FAIR USE NOTICE: THIS SITE MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL THE USE OF WHICH HAS NOT ALWAYS BEEN SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED BY THE COPYRIGHT OWNER. MATERIAL FROM DIVERSE AND SOMETIMES TEMPORARY SOURCES IS BEING MADE AVAILABLE IN A PERMANENT UNIFIED MANNER, AS PART OF AN EFFORT TO ADVANCE UNDERSTANDING OF THE SOCIAL JUSTICE ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH EMINENT DOMAIN AND THE PRIVATIZATION OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE (AMONG OTHER THINGS). IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS IS A 'FAIR USE' OF THE INFORMATION AS ALLOWED UNDER SECTION 107 OF THE US COPYRIGHT LAW. IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 USC SECTION 107, THE SITE IS MAINTAINED WITHOUT PROFIT FOR THOSE WHO ACCESS IT FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. FOR MORE INFORMATION, SEE: HTTP://WWW.LAW.CORNELL.EDU/ TO USE MATERIAL REPRODUCED ON THIS SITE FOR PURPOSES THAT GO BEYOND 'FAIR USE', PERMISSION IS REQUIRED FROM THE COPYRIGHT OWNER INDICATED WITH A NAME AND INTERNET LINK AT THE END OF EACH ITEM. (NOTE: THE TEXT OF THIS NOTICE WAS ALSO LIFTED FROM CORRIDORNEWS.BLOGSPOT.COM)
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Arlington City Council’s Special Use Permits for Urban Drilling is an unaddressed PUBLIC RISK !

  1. Well, in my opinion the ONLY acceptable methods are SUSTAINABLE. That means solar and wind. Period. Spending money on anything else is just short-sighted.

  2. Urban drilling should have never happened period. Our government can not prove that they are acting in good faith to keep us safe in our homes. Did they forget they are
    charged by law to do that? What do they think police and fire departments are for? Pecan picking?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s