This Arlington has a Plan for Wind Energy Conversion Systems

Ft Worth mayor seems open to new adventures...will Ft Worth beat Arlington to the wind energy game “play”?

Ft Worth mayor seems open to new adventures…will Ft Worth beat Arlington to the wind energy “play”?

A friend said he saw an interesting posting for some real estate out in the Tx Panhandle. The seller was going to retain 50% of Mineral Rights AND 50% of Wind Power Rights.

Thinking of exerci$ing “your” Wind Power Right$? Heres a link of some hurdles.

Below is a cut and paste of…..


Ordinance 212: Ordinance Amending Zoning Ordinance Relating to Wind Energy Conversion Systems Chairman Nagel called to order the public hearing regarding the proposed Ordinance 212 – An Ordinance Amending the Arlington Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance 169) by Adding Section 13, Subd. 7, Relating to Wind Energy Conversion Systems (WECS). P&Z Adm. Smith-Strack stated that the ordinance had been introduced initially a few months earlier, but had been postponed so that information could be obtained from the municipal electric association regarding their proposal to place commercial WECS in all the member cities. She stated that the ordinance now contains standards for both commercial and non-commercial WECS.

The Committee reviewed and talked about (at length) a memo from City Administrator Jaunich who expressed concern that the setbacks (750 ft. from a structure and 200 ft. radius) for WECS were too large or restrictive. The memo also expressed concern about where commercial WECS should or should not be allowed. Smith-Strack clarified that the setback distance from the property line was 110% of the tower height plus the length of the blade (when extended) and the 750 ft. setback was from the base of the tower to an existing residential structure. Some discussion was held on possible sites for WECS within the city limits, in conjunction with possible future expansion needs. Smith-Strack commented that regardless of which zoning district(s) WECS will be permitted in, that a Conditional Use Permit would have to be issued. She was of the opinion that commercial WECS shouldn’t be allowed in residential districts, but if they are allowed, that a minimum lot size should be specified within the ordinance. She stated that she was ok with reducing the setback from a residential structure to 450 ft. and radius setback to 175 ft. as proposed by Adm. Jaunich.

Motion by Hislop, seconded by Kramer, and passed by unanimous vote to make the following changes to the proposed Ordinance 212-WECS:

1.) Section 4B will remain as presented (WECS allowed within Industrial Districts or on property owned by the City of Arlington or the Arlington EDA;

2.) Section 5B will be changed to allow for a 450 ft. setback;

3.) Section 5C will be changed to allow for a 175 ft. radius setback.


Adopted by the Planning & Zoning Committee of the City of Arlington this 6th day of March, 2008. Signed: /s/ Lowell Nagel____________________ Attest: /s/ Cynthia Smith-Strack_______________

Chairperson Whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and executed.


Planning & Zoning Administrator




1. The purpose of this Article is to establish standards and procedures by which the installation and operation of wind energy conversion systems (WECS) shall be governed within the City.

2. Ornamental wind devices that are not a WECS shall be exempt from the provisions of this Section. 3. Definitions:

A. Commercial Wind Energy Conversion System (WECS): A WECS of equal to or greater than 40kW in total name plate generating capacity.

B. Feeder Line: A power line that carries electrical power from one or more wind turbines or individual transformers associated with individual wind turbines to the point of interconnection with the electrical power grid, in the case of interconnection with the high voltage transmission systems the point of interconnection shall be the substation servicing the WECS.

Section 13 of the Arlington Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance 169) shall be amended to include Subdivision 7 as follows:


C. Meteorological Tower: Towers erected to measure wind speed and direction plus other data relevant to siting WECS. Meteorological Towers shall be regulated as commercial towers under Ordinance 196 relating to Telecommunication Towers, Antennas and Related Facilities, as may be amended.

D. Non-commercial WECS: A WECS of less than 40kW in total name plate generating capacity.

E. Rotor Diameter: The diameter of the circle described by the moving rotor blades.

F. WECS Tower: A vertical structure that supports an electrical generator, rotor blades and/or meteorological equipment used in the operation of a WECS.

G. WECS Total Height: The highest point above ground reached by a rotor tip or any other part of the WECS.

H. WECS Tower Height: The total height of the WECS exclusive of the rotor blades.

I. Wind Energy Conversion System (WECS:) An electrical generating facility comprised of one or more wind turbines and accessory facilities, including but not limited to: power lines, transformers, substations, and metrological towers, that operate by converting the kinetic energy of wind into electrical energy. The energy may be used on-site or distributed into the electrical grid.

J. Wind Turbine: Any piece of electrical generating equipment that converts the kinetic energy of blowing wind into electrical energy through the use of airfoils or similar devices to capture the wind.

Conditional Use Permit Required.

A. The erection of a wind energy conversion system shall require a conditional use permit, as prescribed by the Arlington Zoning Ordinance.

B. Commercial wind energy conversion systems governed shall only be allowed as conditional uses within Industrial Districts or on property owned by the City of Arlington or the Arlington EDA.

C. Non-commercial wind energy conversion systems shall be allowed as conditional uses within the R1/AG-R2/AG Residence & Agricultural District on lots at least ten (10) acres in area. The acreage restriction is required to protect WECS from encroachment by other uses or structures and to accommodate required setback between the WECS and property lines.

D. All applications for a WECS conditional use permit shall be accompanied by a site plan drawn to scale and dimensioned displaying following:

1) The names of project applicants and property owners.

2) Project address and legal description.

3) A description of the project including: name plate generating capacity, proposed tower height, and proposed rotor diameter.

4) Proposed site layout.

5) Engineer’s certification of structure design, electrical design and fall zone.

6) Location and height of all existing and proposed buildings, structures, above ground utilities and trees on the lot, including both existing and proposed structures and guy wire anchors.

7) Location and height of all adjacent buildings, structures, aboveground utilities and trees located within three hundred fifty (350) feet of the exterior boundaries of the property in question.

8) An elevation drawing of the premises accurately depicting the proposed WECS and its relationship to structures on the subject site and adjacent lots.

9) A written statement or map describing how the proposed structure relates to existing arrival/departure corridors utilized by air ambulances.

10) In addition, applications for commercial WECS shall include: a. An FAA permit application, if required.



Performance Standards: A. A WECS shall not interfere with hospital heliport approach/departure corridors. B. Setbacks.

1) No part of a WECS (including guy wire anchors) shall be located within or above any required front, side or rear yard setback.

2) WECS towers shall be setback from all property lines a total of 110% of the WECS total height.

3) Commercial WECS shall be setback a minimum of 450 feet from residential structures. This setback is reciprocal in that no dwelling unit may be constructed within 450 feet of a commercial WECS.

4) Commercial WECS shall be setback a minimum of 600 feet from wetlands, public waters, floodplains and shoreline impact zones.

C. Blade arcs created by the WECS shall have a minimum of thirty (30) feet of clearance over any structure or tree within a one hundred seventy-five (175) foot radius.

D. Each WECS shall be equipped with both a manual and automatic braking device capable of stopping the WECS operation in high winds (40 miles per hour or greater).

E. Each WECS shall be grounded to protect against natural lightning strikes in conformance with the National Electrical Code as adopted by the City. To prevent unauthorized climbing, WECS towers must comply with one of the following provisions:

1) Tower climbing apparatus shall not be located within twelve (12) feet of the ground.

2) A locked anti-climb device shall be installed on the tower.

3) Towers capable of being climbed shall be enclosed by a locked, protective fence at least six (6) feet high.

F. WECS shall have a sign posted at the base of the tower containing the following information: A high voltage warning, the manufacturer’s name, an emergency phone number, and, emergency shutdown procedures.

G. WECS shall not have affixed or attached any lights, reflectors, flashers, or any other illumination, except for illumination devices required by FAA regulations or as required by the City if within heliport arrival or departure corridors.

H. WECS shall be designed and constructed so as not to cause radio and television interference.

I. Noises emanating from the operation of WECS shall be in compliance with and regulated by the State of Minnesota Pollution Control Standard.

J. No WECS shall be interconnected with a local electrical utility company until the utility company has reviewed and commented on it. The interconnection of the WECS with the utility company shall adhere to the National Electrical Code as adopted by the City.

K. Standard drawings of the structural components of the wind energy conversion system and support structures, including base and footings shall be provided along with engineering data and calculations to demonstrate compliance with the structural design provisions of the Building Code. Drawings and engineering calculations shall be certified by a Minnesota licensed engineer.

L. WECS electrical equipment and connections shall be designed and installed in adherence to the Electrical Code.

If a WECS is not maintained in operational condition and poses a potential safety hazard, the owner shall take expeditious action to correct the situation.

b. c. d.

A decommissioning plan. Locations of WECS within two miles of the proposed WECS. Projected sound levels (decibel) at property lines.

7. Any WECS or tower which is not used for twelve (12) successive months shall be deemed abandoned and shall be dismantled and removed from the property at the expense of the property owner.

Section 2

Effective Date: This Ordinance is effective upon its adoption and publication as prescribed by law.

Adopted by the City of Arlington on the ___ day of ________, 2008.

____ ________ Attest: James R. Kreft, (NOT ARLINGTON TX ) Mayor



About Kim Triolo Feil

Since TX Statute 253.005 forbids drilling in heavily settled municipalities, I unsuccessfully ran for City Council Seat to try to enforce this. Since Urban Drilling, our drinking water has almost tripled for TTHM's. Before moving to Arlington in 1990, I lived in Norco’s “cancer alley”, a refinery town. It was only after Urban Drilling in Arlington did I start having health effects. After our drill site was established closest to my home, the chronic nosebleeds started. I know there are more canaries here in Arlington having reactions to our industrialized airshed (we have 55-60 padsites of gas wells). Come forward and report to me those having health issues especially if you live to the north/northwest of a drill site so I can map your health effects on this blog. My youtube account is KimFeilGood. FAIR USE NOTICE: THIS SITE MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL THE USE OF WHICH HAS NOT ALWAYS BEEN SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED BY THE COPYRIGHT OWNER. MATERIAL FROM DIVERSE AND SOMETIMES TEMPORARY SOURCES IS BEING MADE AVAILABLE IN A PERMANENT UNIFIED MANNER, AS PART OF AN EFFORT TO ADVANCE UNDERSTANDING OF THE SOCIAL JUSTICE ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH EMINENT DOMAIN AND THE PRIVATIZATION OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE (AMONG OTHER THINGS). IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS IS A 'FAIR USE' OF THE INFORMATION AS ALLOWED UNDER SECTION 107 OF THE US COPYRIGHT LAW. IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 USC SECTION 107, THE SITE IS MAINTAINED WITHOUT PROFIT FOR THOSE WHO ACCESS IT FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. FOR MORE INFORMATION, SEE: HTTP://WWW.LAW.CORNELL.EDU/ TO USE MATERIAL REPRODUCED ON THIS SITE FOR PURPOSES THAT GO BEYOND 'FAIR USE', PERMISSION IS REQUIRED FROM THE COPYRIGHT OWNER INDICATED WITH A NAME AND INTERNET LINK AT THE END OF EACH ITEM. (NOTE: THE TEXT OF THIS NOTICE WAS ALSO LIFTED FROM CORRIDORNEWS.BLOGSPOT.COM)
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to This Arlington has a Plan for Wind Energy Conversion Systems

  1. CJ says:

    Heah Kim–
    Just saw You at WFs and I’ve already found this about ‘The Garden of Eden’ that You were talking about.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s