ACTION ITEM as Chevron doubling its frack (water) attack in west TX

As ‘Chevron plans to pivot from big projects to west Texas shale’, and double its rig counts there, public comment is now being taken on the 2017 Texas Water Development Board’s water plan…

Here are my comments, please send yours to email
—– Forwarded Message —–
From: kim feil <>
To: “” <>
Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2016 7:49 PM
Subject: Comment on 2017 TWDB plan
My name is Kim Feil from Arlington TX. Here are my comments for the 2017 TWDB water plan. I have been looking at the loopholes in public protections related to our water supplies and have many points to share. This 1994 USGS link , which is over 20 years old, shows research that uncovered pesticide detects along the Texas Trinity River (which supplies over 50% of Texans their drinking water). Note this is a SURFACE runoff problem and can be related to the risk we have in the huge build out of all the oil & gas activities along our water ways.
Screen shot 2015-12-08 at 12.41.17 PM
Screen shot 2015-12-08 at 1.40.34 PM
In the 2011 Lake Arlington Master Plan 
on pg 511 “Under this scenario, an average a gas well site point source is estimated to contribute 7,100 lbs of TSS annually to the receiving waters in the watershedand accounting for the increased loads is important.
1) While I see rain harvesting, is there any provisions for water banking in times of floods? Here is a California pilot program I have info on…but careful what we wish for if the water being banked is impaired by all the drilling build out. of an experiment occurring in an area that I am watching in terms of known ground/drinking water contamination. MODESTO California was one of the cities that had Uranium in their drinking water that was “drawn up” from drought, aquifer pumping, and irrigation of crops/orchards. When that story broke, I also looked at our Texas Trinity River and recognized a similar NORM risk to our water from those factors in addition to the added risk of our fracking build out with toxic SURFACE storm water run off.
Since then UT Arlington’s CLEAR has more information of indirect aggregate risks to GROUND water quality in their latest study…
Indirect evidence of pollutant migration via microannular fissures in well casing”
If you want the full UTA Clear pdf. please email and ask for the details on their study, “Elucidating hydraulic fracturing impacts on groundwater quality using a regional geospatial statistical modeling approach”
UPDATE for TWDB response on item #1 water banking……
—– Forwarded Message —–
From: Merry Klonower <>
To: kim feil <>
Cc: Matt Nelson <>
Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2016 5:07 PM
Subject: RE: 2017 State Water Plan 2 questions

Ms. Feil,

We’ve answered your questions below as we understand them but if you need additional information, please let us know.

1)      By “banking” we understand you to mean retaining or storing flood water for later use.  Yes, the state water plan includes both existing and additional future water supply from reservoirs that capture and store large volumes of water during high flow events, including when flooding occurs, and using that water at other times including during times of drought.

The water plan includes water demand projections for all water use sectors including for power generation, manufacturing, and mining.  While the state water plan considers the impacts on water quality of the recommended strategies in the plan, the plan primarily focuses on meeting water needs (potential shortages) through a variety of strategies including conservation and water supply projects. 

Best regards,

Merry Klonower

Director of Communications

Texas Water Development Board

—-end update————–

2) As ‘Chevron plans to pivot from big projects to west Texas shale’and double its rig counts there, pg D 95 reads…….. 
‘Mining needs increased by approximately two-thirds from the 2012 plan’s estimates.
This is partly due to the increased water demand projections associated with hydraulic fracturing activities’. This current TWDB draft may NOT encompass this breaking story of Chevron’s frack attack on west Texas’ water inventories. I feel that communication to Chevron as to where they will procure water for hydraulic fracturing is in order.
3) No one is keeping track of what produced water quantities leave the padsites and if they make it to the injection well sites. A remedy is to categorize the produced waters as TENORM which requires TxDot manifests with more control and accountability.  This event as documented was on I-30 just West of University Dr. on 4/5/2014….
4) In the future, O&G activities could include less disposal wells and more “treat & release” of produced waters where allowable west of the 98th meridian  but the RRC does not require any treatment or testing for NORM.
Here is the …

Application for a Permit to Discharge Produced Water to Inland Waters

Currently the $750. If the discharged water will not reach surface waters of the State or the discharge point is west of the 98th meridian and the water is for agriculture or wildlife use, the fee is not required”.
The EPA has it’s own application too…see this link here.
Operators are similarly allowed to discharge mud/land farming drilling mud both cases
self-testing/reporting does NOT include looking for NORM.
I was told how expensive it is to test for radioactivity in water monitoring. 
When Arlington TX had a spill near the LABC church and a densely populated neighborhood I blogged the results complaining that no one tested for NORM then.
Here is the RRC self test/self reporting criteria before releasing produced waters in Texas (west of the 98th meridian).
Screen shot 2016-01-03 at 2.37.27 PMScreen shot 2016-01-03 at 2.37.41 PM

Screen shot 2016-01-03 at 4.59.29 PM

GAO report on produced water constituents page 12
5) And besides not asking for NORM or TENORM, the RRC also doesn’t require testing for constituents found on the Frac Focus Chemical Disclosure Registry either…remember some of those are top-secret…

Screen shot 2016-01-03 at 5.03.31 PM

Screen shot 2016-01-03 at 5.04.19 PM

GAO page 13 note: some more better news is that gas wells have 5 times less contaminated water than oil wells, but 5 times less than what?
6) AS SEISMICITY (frackquakes) may begin to LIMIT the use of some injection wells in Texas, we need to require rigorous testing before releasing or selling refurbished O&G waste waters such as for brine road salting, dust control, & fire fighting.
They also say they use the distilled liquid to re-frack with. Part of what I am concerned with recycling brine/flowback is the creation of what I  call increasing toxicity (“frack-on-crack”) risk if they use any type of chlorine application (they say they use activated charcoal to make the distilled water but the very nature of chlorine is that it is a salt and wiki says Calcium chloride (chemical formula CaCl2) is the ionic compound of calcium and chlorine.)…they may be making a bromate/halogen nightmare in storm run off effluents?
Regarding Calcium chloride, a company called Tetra chemicals says “This product is widely used in oilfield applications as completion and workover fluids to increase density, and as a drilling mud additive to increase density and prevent clay hydration”. In Oklahoma, they are already starting to limit some injection wells so we must ensure the new product isn’t worse than the original waste product.
Screen shot 2016-01-04 at 4.19.46 PM

Screen shot 2016-01-04 at 4.20.00 PM

7) Since the urban drilling started in Arlington where I live, in 2007 our TTHM’s have started going up to almost triple the pre drilling numbers. Likewise in Ft Worth, their TTHM’s have started going down in 2012 that correlate with the drilling BUST in the Barnett Shale, and so the TWDB needs to understand the TTHM impacts if the urban drilling boom returns to north Texas.
Water PROTECTION against toxic padsite runoff and casing failures is essential to be built into the water plan, yet not much in the draft on this elephant in the room.


About Kim Triolo Feil

Since TX Statute 253.005 forbids drilling in heavily settled municipalities, I unsuccessfully ran for City Council Seat to try to enforce this. Since Urban Drilling, our drinking water has almost tripled for TTHM's. Before moving to Arlington in 1990, I lived in Norco’s “cancer alley”, a refinery town. It was only after Urban Drilling in Arlington did I start having health effects. After our drill site was established closest to my home, the chronic nosebleeds started. I know there are more canaries here in Arlington having reactions to our industrialized airshed (we have 55-60 padsites of gas wells). Come forward and report to me those having health issues especially if you live to the north/northwest of a drill site so I can map your health effects on this blog. My youtube account is KimFeilGood. FAIR USE NOTICE: THIS SITE MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL THE USE OF WHICH HAS NOT ALWAYS BEEN SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED BY THE COPYRIGHT OWNER. MATERIAL FROM DIVERSE AND SOMETIMES TEMPORARY SOURCES IS BEING MADE AVAILABLE IN A PERMANENT UNIFIED MANNER, AS PART OF AN EFFORT TO ADVANCE UNDERSTANDING OF THE SOCIAL JUSTICE ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH EMINENT DOMAIN AND THE PRIVATIZATION OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE (AMONG OTHER THINGS). IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS IS A 'FAIR USE' OF THE INFORMATION AS ALLOWED UNDER SECTION 107 OF THE US COPYRIGHT LAW. IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 USC SECTION 107, THE SITE IS MAINTAINED WITHOUT PROFIT FOR THOSE WHO ACCESS IT FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. FOR MORE INFORMATION, SEE: HTTP://WWW.LAW.CORNELL.EDU/ TO USE MATERIAL REPRODUCED ON THIS SITE FOR PURPOSES THAT GO BEYOND 'FAIR USE', PERMISSION IS REQUIRED FROM THE COPYRIGHT OWNER INDICATED WITH A NAME AND INTERNET LINK AT THE END OF EACH ITEM. (NOTE: THE TEXT OF THIS NOTICE WAS ALSO LIFTED FROM CORRIDORNEWS.BLOGSPOT.COM)
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s