“NOW” they want to exempt conventional from unconventional fracking in SB279 … geesch!

UPDATE here is a recent North Texans for Natural Gas shrill report papers touting fracking…https://barnettshalehell.wordpress.com/2016/06/20/dan-steward-todd-staples-in-the-barnett-shale-hell-hall-of-shame-quotes/
FYI there is this S.B. 279 senate bill to differentiate conventional production from proposed regulation that is going to the Pennsylvania governor….http://www.ogj.com/articles/2016/06/bill-to-differentiate-conventional-production-goes-to-pennsylvania-governor.html?cmpid=EnlDailyJune162016&eid=288262587&bid=1436022 where they broadly define…



Sometimes you just gotta laugh cause they have been defending hydraulic fracturing saying……
But we been fracking for at least 65 years“…..ha ha…so lets get an ASME engineers peek at how the conventional differs from the unconventional….(I boldfaced the dates)

Explosive Origins

“The mechanical principles of fracking have not changed since the first brave shooter dropped an explosive charge down a well in the 1860s. Then as now, the task is to deliver a powerful force to a designated depth underground, rubblizing the hard rock formations around the well to stimulate the release oil or gas trapped within….”

Diagram of Lt. Col. Edward A. Robert’s “exploding torpedo”.

“The well shooter’s original tools of choice were gunpowder and, later, liquid nitroglycerin…”

I laugh as protecting the special secret sauce has its orgins too, “….defending his patents from operators who took to fracking under cover of night to avoid Roberts’ royalties. One explanation for the origins of the term “moonlighting” comes from this rogue practice.

Commercial Fracking Explodes

According to a 2010 fracking history by the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), the idea of non-explosive alternatives to nitroglycerin took root in the 1930s. Experiments through the next decade paved the way for the first industrial-scale commercial uses of the modern patented “Hydrafrac” process in 1949, with Halliburton holding an exclusive license in the early years. SPE recounts that 332 wells were fracked in the first year alone, with up to 75 percent production increases recorded. By the mid-1950s, fracking hit a pace of about 3,000 wells a month.

A typical early fracture took 750 gallons of fluid (water, gelled crude oil, or gelled kerosene) and 400 lbm of sand. By contrast, modern methods can use up to 8 million gallons of water and 75,000 to 320,000 pounds of sand. Fracking fluids can take the form of foams, gels, or slickwater combinations and often include benzene, hydrochloric acid, friction reducers, guar gum, biocides, and diesel fuel. Likewise, the hydraulic horsepower (hhp) needed to pump fracking material has risen from an average of about 75 hhp in the early days to an average of more than 1,500 hhp today, with big jobs requiring more than 10,000 hhp.

Fracking’s new golden age began in 2003,….” 

So unconventional should be time stamped when?….mid 1950’s? …Texas’ George P Mitchell  (aka Father of fracking) 1980’s or 1990’s?….

So which FRACK do they NOT want attacked? Pollution from gun powder, nitroglycerin, gelled crude oil/kerosene…etc (NOTE the ASME report does not mention depleted uranium used in our unconventional perfing gun process).

Some people think that unconventional is when they started drilling horizontally or “directional” drilling. But alas there are historical accounts of accessing/stealing hydrocarbons off of another person’s property by slanted drilling.

Frackers have a history of needing to be jailed in my opinion.

There are also references to the acronym HVHF (High Volume Hydraulic Fracturing).

I once had it explained to me that conventional taps pockets/pools VERTICALLY that are easy to reach than the hydrocarbons trapped in the shale rock they directionally drill for…

A recent profracking article attempting (and failed) to parse out conventional from unconventional “oil” is here…

http://www.oilandgasinvestor.com/blog/conventional-vs-unconventional-oil-780801 but the author basicly does NOT give details….on the other hand alot of useful info is here http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/08/inquiring-minds-anthony-ingraffea-science-fracking-methane from Cornell University engineering professor Anthony Ingraffea about the CURRENT process’ risks that address disposal issues and issues in blasting underground  at “pressures approaching what you would get if you put, say, 10 SUVs on your fingertip,” 


—–hells bells a bomb is a bomb is a fracking-the-earth-polluting-bomb!——–


About Kim Triolo Feil

Since TX Statute 253.005 forbids drilling in heavily settled municipalities, I unsuccessfully ran for City Council Seat to try to enforce this. Since Urban Drilling, our drinking water has almost tripled for TTHM's. Before moving to Arlington in 1990, I lived in Norco’s “cancer alley”, a refinery town. It was only after Urban Drilling in Arlington did I start having health effects. After our drill site was established closest to my home, the chronic nosebleeds started. I know there are more canaries here in Arlington having reactions to our industrialized airshed (we have 55-60 padsites of gas wells). Come forward and report to me those having health issues especially if you live to the north/northwest of a drill site so I can map your health effects on this blog. My youtube account is KimFeilGood. FAIR USE NOTICE: THIS SITE MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL THE USE OF WHICH HAS NOT ALWAYS BEEN SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED BY THE COPYRIGHT OWNER. MATERIAL FROM DIVERSE AND SOMETIMES TEMPORARY SOURCES IS BEING MADE AVAILABLE IN A PERMANENT UNIFIED MANNER, AS PART OF AN EFFORT TO ADVANCE UNDERSTANDING OF THE SOCIAL JUSTICE ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH EMINENT DOMAIN AND THE PRIVATIZATION OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE (AMONG OTHER THINGS). IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS IS A 'FAIR USE' OF THE INFORMATION AS ALLOWED UNDER SECTION 107 OF THE US COPYRIGHT LAW. IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 USC SECTION 107, THE SITE IS MAINTAINED WITHOUT PROFIT FOR THOSE WHO ACCESS IT FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. FOR MORE INFORMATION, SEE: HTTP://WWW.LAW.CORNELL.EDU/ TO USE MATERIAL REPRODUCED ON THIS SITE FOR PURPOSES THAT GO BEYOND 'FAIR USE', PERMISSION IS REQUIRED FROM THE COPYRIGHT OWNER INDICATED WITH A NAME AND INTERNET LINK AT THE END OF EACH ITEM. (NOTE: THE TEXT OF THIS NOTICE WAS ALSO LIFTED FROM CORRIDORNEWS.BLOGSPOT.COM)
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s